Articles on Law and Traffic Issues

The force of law and its applicability to a specific event depends upon the law’s jurisdiction over the particular person having been established on the record of the matter. The issue of jurisdiction is everything when it comes to victimless offenses being asserted by a fictional accuser over a natural man or woman presumed to be acting in the capacity of a legal fiction.  

Legal vs. Lawful; What Is The Difference Between These Two Concepts

This Game Changer Demolishes Court’s Jurisdiction
Vocational Science of Freedom Technology

Lady Lawyer Educates Policy Enforcer on Law
Proof That Policy Enforcers Are Not Being Taught This

Take Control Of The Name
With An Assumed Name Certificate

The Twelve Presumptions Of Court Which Must Be Overcome

The American Legal System Is Not What You Think It Is
What I Have Learned So Far

Concealment Of Material Facts Triggers Estoppel

Right To Travel by Jack McLamb, retired police officer

Updated Significance of Jack McLamb’s Article Right to Travel” 

One Thing Jack McLamb Got Wrong
And The Right Of Avoidance

Just What Is The Law?
And To Whom Does It Apply?

What Does That Phrase (The laws sometimes sleep...) Mean?

What Is Public Law and Private Law, Part One
And Why You Need To Know The Difference

What Is Public Law and Private Law, Part Two
And Why You Need To Know The Difference

What Is A Special Appearance In Court?

Special Appearance In Court And Your Right Of Avoidance
Breaking the Choke Hold of the Code

The Two Faces of Jurisdiction
What You Need To Know To Assert Remedy

Are The Laws (And Limitations) Of The Republic Still Applicable?
Can Remedy Be Found To Override Statutory Law?

The Procedure Of Honor And Dishonor In Dealing With Government

What Is A Demurrer?
How Does It Relate To A Victimless Traffic Violation

What Is An Abatement?
And How Can It Be Used For Remedy?

Upcoming Articles Under Composition:

The next article

The next article

Common law maxim:
Jus publicum privatorum pactis mutari non potest.  A public right cannot be changed by private agreement.

Maxim reflected in case law:
“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot thus be converted into a crime.” – Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d 486, at 489 (1956)