The Purpose Of And How To Use The
Common Law Remedy Website Part One
Many
people researching legal redress for handling a victimless violation of
the Motor Vehicle Code who end up arriving at the Common Law Remedy
website seeking advice or counsel on a legal matter have done so
because they are searching for a product or method (a legal
loophole or other presumed procedural shortcut) that will help them
deal with a frivolous traffic ticket or citation. But this is
not the correct approach or attitude to take when attempting to use the
information available on the website.
People erroneously presume that the common law process exposed in the
free report will, all by itself, handle a matter that has come before a
court. And while in years past this might have been true at
the time, in the present adversarial legal climate, the courts have
adjusted their approach to this issue making it even more difficult for
people to figure out how to properly use that process
The Common Law Remedy website (aka beattraffictickets.org) was
originally established to address the lack of knowledge, background,
training, and education in law that many contemporary people lack when
attempting to address a legal matter being thrust at them by the legal
society. Anyone who has a rudimentary knowledge of the common
law as it is supposed to be asserted in America knows, on the surface,
that it is fundamentally a separate jurisdiction from the statutory law
implemented in government courtrooms. At one time, these
courtrooms recognized the common law along side the statutes; however
the politics from that time until today have changed to the point that
most, if not all, inferior courts in states no longer recognize the
common law based upon political reasons alone. If you have
some knowledge of how the court functions and realize that you do not
have the necessary background, training or education in law to carry on
a battle with the legal system, then you can decide to take an
alternate course of action rather than submit yourself to a sudden
death, so to speak, situation that you will face in a government
courtroom.
Therefore, one of the fundamental principles of law that any court must
primarily consider in the first instance is the establishment of
jurisdiction by the plaintiff with regard to the alleged
defendant’s obligation to address the complaint being
brought. When that jurisdiction cannot be established on the
record of the matter with regard to the two parties, the court must
dismiss the matter altogether. This is just a fundamental
principle of law, when actual law (as opposed to color of law statute)
is being honored and recognized in the court
Consequently, when attempting to use a common law process in a
statutory court, the person asserting that law process needs to be
aware of being able to fulfill the requisite elements of evidence
needing to be entered onto the record in order to be able to disqualify
the plaintiff’s presumption of jurisdiction. Either
that, or the person needs to understand how to maintain his stance in
the matter without inadvertently consenting orally to the
plaintiff’s jursidiction. The latter of these two
approaches can be the most difficult of the two to retain, as judges
are trained in rhetorical syllogism in order to trick
apparent consent
out of a person. For example, the judge will ask leading questions in
order to get the person to respond, which if he does respond without
asking a question of his own, he is instantly deemed to have handed
over personam jurisdiction. But that would only be a false
impression on the part of the victim. In Part Two of this
article, you will learn about the only way that you can actually turn
over jurisdiction to a court which has no evidence before it that
personam juisdiction has been attained by anyone! Pay attention and
learn!
It is interesting to note that the employer of both the prosecutor and
the judge in these courts is the same entity posing as the plaintiff:
the STATE OF whatever state. No appearance of judicial
impartiality here to be found!
But in law, there is always a problem with a judge using such specious
logic when attempting to convince a person that jurisdiction has been
handed over In that instance, one would need to object to the
judge’s assertion of jurisdiction on the ground that the
burden of proof of jurisdiction is on the plaintiff and not the
judge. If the judge is asserting jurisdiction using such
deceitful methods,
he is
practicing law from the bench, and needs to
disqualify himself from the matter immediately. Either that,
or if he will not, you need to inform the judge that you object to his
actions and will appeal his determination in a higher court.
But, if you’ve ever been in one of these courts, you know
that it is unlikely that he ever will recuse himself for such a petty
reason. This is a business, for God’s sake, not a
Hall of Justice, and the judge is the banker, waiting for his
opportunity to fleece the unsuspecting victim of his property (money or
freedom).
The judge doubtless will continue to try to intimidate the alleged
defendant until the defendant breaks down and quits the fight
(otherwise known in merchant or commercial law as “leaving
the field of battle”). The first party to leave the
field of battle loses the battle.
One of the main principles of asserting a common law process in a
statutory courtroom is that one must do so in one’s own
right,
Sui Juris, from the sanctum of one’s own
mind. (Look up these legal terms in a competent law
dictionary if you are not familiar with their meaning.) In
other words, you must know what you are doing if you wish to assert the
common law in such a circumstance. If you, by mistake, hire
an attorney to speak for you, that is evidence to the court of
incompetence and literally handing over personam jurisdiction to the
plaintiff by allowing a third party to
re-present your
“person” in the matter, and will likely end up in
forfeiture of the matter through ignorance of the Law and the
“color of law” system imposed by the state known as
statutory law. But statutory law is merely corporate
commercial by-law, corporate policy. It is not
the
true Law of the universe.
It is for this and many other reasons that we do not become involved in
anyone’s legal matter. We cannot and do not advise
people in any of this because we are not a licensed attorney
representing you, and therefore are unable to offer legal advice to
anyone. We will, however, provide real world commentary and
feedback regarding the way someone may propose to handle a
matter. In that way, our role is strictly educational and
informational. Choices for action are left up to the
principal accused.
The information on the website is strictly for educational purposes,
and not necessarily meant to be used in any particular legal
matter. If you wish to use the common law in a matter, it
behooves you, first and foremost, to become educated in the
principles
of the law before you intend to use it in an actual
controversy. Once a person understands the depth of the pool
(i.e., the lack of personal competence and knowledge in asserting the
law) that he or she has entered when contemplating engaging in a legal
matter, it pretty quickly focuses the mind on finding the most
expedient way out of the situation so that one can continue their
education in the law in order to be ready for the next time the system
will test them.
It is sad, but for the majority of people who arrive at the website and
order the free report, it is the first time that they have stopped to
consider what they would do if faced with having to handle a legal
matter that the system throws at them. That is to say, most
will not have sought out the information beforehand so as to apprise
themselves of its benefit before needing to use it. Therefore
if you arrived at the website thinking that you were going to find a
“silver bullet” to handle a traffic ticket, and you
were surprised to learn that it may not do that for you, that is a
small price to pay for having this information finally brought to your
attention in a way that it actually
got your attention and interest to
learn.
As mentioned above, the website is meant to provide people with
information about actual law so that they can compare that form of law,
and its benefits, with the form of law that is being imposed upon them
by the legal system. For some people, this is the first time
they have ever been expose to these concepts. And so, it can
feel empowering to learn that there is a way that they can address a
grievance they have with the legal system and come out on
top. But it will take a little bit of work in terms of
educating oneself about the relevant issues at stake in order to ensure
a positive outcome in a legal matter.
In that regard, when considering the use of actual law up against color
of law statute, it is important to acquire the skill, and begin
training oneself in, the art of learning
how to think about addressing
a matter at law. The first step to learning how to think
about an issue begins with knowing and understanding the principles of
law at play in the matter. There are certain principles of law
(foundational concepts meant to apply fairness to the matter) that if
the accuser can be found to be violating one of these, his goose is
cooked. This is why it is essential that one learn about these
principles because it can make it easier to find a winning strategy if
you know your opponent has a fundamental weakness that can be exploited
in your favor.
This is turning the tables on the legal system, and rather than
attempting to defend what is indefensible (because the statutes do not
apply to people, except in very tightly controlled circumstances), you
go on the offence to provide evidence that the system is not playing
fairly, and is attempting to commit a fraud upon the court.
Remember this: fraud does not exist until it is discovered.
It is your task to show the court the fraud with which the plaintiff is
attemtping to get away. This is an offensive approach to the
matter, as you become the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in the instant
action becomes the defendant having to defend his fraudulent actions
which he cannot do! Remember this: those who are bringing a
legitimate cause to the court as a plaintiff more often than not win
over those who enter the court with “dirty hands.”
While this brief introduction into how to use the Common Law Remedy
website may not immediately be of assistance in a current legal matter,
that matter can be used, if one intends to fight it, as a learning tool
and springboard into a deeper and hopefully more engaging study of the
law for those who stick with it in order to learn how they can maintain
and assert their
natural rights as a man or woman being faced with a
frivolous legal matter from an artificial entity.
The Law Resource page on the website contains educational information
on law related to this brief introductory article. We will
begin taking a look at some of the nuts and bolts—the
educational materials and legal concepts—needing first to be
learned regarding certain legal principles and ideas that may be used
to put your accuser into a box of which he cannot get out. As
stated above, sometimes, when the situation calls for it, the best
defense is a good offense. And a good offense in this case
most certainly involves shifting the burden of proof onto your opponent
when he doesn’t have a legal foot on which to
stand. Speaking of which, when you can disqualify an
accuser’s (the plaintiff’s)
standing in a matter,
it literally pulls the rug out from underneath his feet with regard to
his ability to bring an action to court.
Therein lies your first homework assignment: look up the legal
defintion of the word “standing” in order to learn
what that term refers to. There are tools (law dictionaries)
mentioned on the Law Resource page that you can use in order to
accomplish that. A person must have standing to bring a
controversy to court. And if he cannot establish his standing
in the matter that he wishes to have adjudicated, then he has no
authority to bring it to court in the first place. Are you
beginning to see what I mean by learning how
to think about the
principles of law? Those same principles can either be your
best friend or your worst foe. It all depends on what the
facts of the matter indicate. If the facts are in your favor
and you have superior standing in the matter, it won’t matter
what kind of nonsense accusation your accuser brings, his ability to
bring it will be invalidated.
This is an essential element of this presentation, that is, the
indispensable requirement of being able to understand the definition,
the legal definition, of legal words and terms Without this
ability you will find it very difficult to comprehend what is really
going on in court. For this you will need to avail yourself
of a good legal dictionary, of which there are a few on the website
that can be downloaded. But two in particular. Be
aware that the government has been very sneaky in its disclosure of
certain definitions, and that some definitions will be found within the
codes and statutes themselves as they apply to the various appropriate
U.S Code titles. While the more fluid and commonly used definitions
will be found in both
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition and
Bouvier’s 1856
A Law Dictionary and the Third Revsion of that
dictionary, Bouvier’s 1914
Law Dictionary and Concise
Encyclopedia, which the government uses as its main source for defining
commonly used legal concepts and issues. Therefore, if you
need to track down the history of the definition of certain terms and
how they have been used by the government in order to take note of any
changes that may have occurred, then the editions of
Bouvier’s is your best choice of source material.
If you are sincere in your desire to learn about the right way to view
a legal matter and to obtain the skills necessary to defeat your
opponent, then you will want to pay attention to this next
point. Those skills will not come without some effort on your
part to assimilate them. And they won’t come if you
are not wise in the use of the time it takes acquire them. In
this regard, the attitude you take to accomplishing this task is of
paramount importance, and will assist in keeping you on the correct
path toward its achievement.
As preview of what is needed, a tactful and ever sensible Roman
stateman, Marcus Tullius Cicero, once presciently stated:
“Wise men are instructed by reason Men of less understanding
[average minds], by experience The most ignorant [simpletons and
idiots], by necessity The beasts [brutes who lack the ability to
reason] by nature [or instinct].” What we learn
from this statement is that wise men who use reason in court, then, are
more likely than not to prevail in the courts. The principles
of law and hence the object of influence in the courts are based on
logic and reason. So it stands to the rational mind that one
should use their knowledge of reason and common sense in order to
present their side of a case. If you wish to learn how to
prevail in court, you must learn how to use the facts so show the
rationale behind the objection to your opponent’s assertion.
And finally, not everyone has the time or the inclination to take on
this task. And that is understandable given the current
disfunctional economic and political climate into which the government,
putting its best tyrannical foot forward, has thrust us at the present
time. If, after you begin delving into this information, this
all seems like too heavy a lift to carry, please do avail yourself of
the option to unsubscribe from this newsletter and website.
There is no need to waste your time on something that you really have
little interest, and even less time, in learning. Your time
would be much better spent, and likely more personally profitable,
pursuing other endeavors which add gravity to your appreciation of
satisfaction and control of your personal life. You can
always take up this study at a later time if you wish.
For those who are ready to begin taking on the responsibility of
learning about the law, your next stop should be to look over the Law
Resource page and begin diving into whatever material piques your
interest. There are essays written by a third party which can
add insight to your knowledge base on law as well as downloadable law
dictionaries and various lists of maxims of law. If you want
to get a better idea about the principles of law, making time to read
carefully through the maxims of law will truly open your eyes to what
is possible by developing a focus on the principles of law.
Of course, there are other principles of law to be found in some of the
legal definitions of terms. So the law dictionaries and the
maxims of law ought to be your close friend in this study.
Do not be discourage if you are not able to learn this quickly enough
in order to use it effectively in a present legal matter.
What is important, for many of you, is that now, perhaps for the first
time in your life, you are exposing your mind to these
concepts. Use this present experience in court to gather
intelligence on your opponent so that you can become aware of the real
world value of gathering such intelligence before intending to do
battle with your opponent. With the proper attitude and
excitement for learning about what can be truly effective, you can
begin to defeat whatever fear you harbor in the thought of having to
appear before a judge in an adversarial setting and learn how to think
on your feet.
The Purpose Of And How To Use The Common Law Remedy Website Part Two
If you would like to learn more about concepts of law so you
can
avoid the whole mess without having to “appear” in
court,
you can download our free ebook
Common
Law Remedy To
Beat Traffic Tickets and learn about the secrets that the
courts and
legal profession don’t want you to know.
_________________
If you’d like to learn more about the law and how it can
serve you, don’t hesitate to check out our
Articles
on Traffic Law
section. Discover some of the secrets of law that you’ve
never been taught!
The
laws sometimes sleep,
but never die.