For Your Consideration: The New
Face of War! Part One
Date: March 1, 2021
Hello Friends,
Again, today, I am deviating from writing directly about the traffic
ticket issue and focusing on some of the larger questions and issues
posed in the last newsletter which attempted to warn people about the
efficacy of vaccines and vaccinations.
Just as the title of this newsletter suggests, we in America are being
faced with the prospect of having to come to terms with an In-Your-Face
effort by forces, over which we have seemingly little control, who are
prosecuting a worldwide agenda against not only American nationals and
our country itself but, more broadly, the people of the world. This is
the new face of War, a war not between two countries, but a war being
waged by multinational corporations against the world’s
nations
and their citizenry. Many people, here and around the world, are aware
of this global push to limit basic human rights, and to subject the
worlds oppressed populations to a corporatists agenda which blatantly
rejects the peoples opinion about how life should be lived on planet
Earth, and forces upon humanity what they call a “new
normal.”
These forces want to tear down all national borders, while at the same
time erecting what can only be called a socialist agenda in each nation
on Earth. Nations will be governed by a centralized global body of
committees under the aegis of the United Nations. These forces have the
manpower, the skill, the technology, and the financial wherewithal to
pull this off. Except they made one big and nasty miscalculation! They
are attempting to pull this off in the only so-called free nation in
the world, the united States of America. And they have vastly
underestimated the will of the American people to remain free and
independent as the nation was originally founded.
Folks, this
is
the new face of
war! It’s not a conventional war (although it may contain
aspects
of one), and it enlists the assistance of domestic government employees
in order to carry out its nefarious deeds. Government employees who
have been constantly brainwashed into to believing that the government
can do no wrong, and is within its legal authority to impose a new
agenda upon the rest of the population without that
citizenry’s
right to dissent and reject that agenda in a fair and impartial
referendum vote on the nature of any changes to the basic structure and
essence of government in America.
This is the point where we learn who, among government employees, keeps
his or her oath of office to “support and defend the
Constitution
of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I
will bear true faith and allegiance to the same. . .” Now,
there’s a legal loophole in this oath that government
employees
take. Can you see it? Better yet, are you aware of the history of the
various constitutions that have existed throughout the history of the
United States? There have been three constitutions. Two of them stating
to be the “Constitution of the United States of
America,”
and the third, the original one of 1787-1789, stated to be the
“Constitution for the United States of America.”
The first volleys of shots have already been fired across the bow of
the American people in the form of a completely bogus viral pandemic
meant, using draconian means, to take down the economy one small
business at a time. And from there to set in its (legitimate
government’s) place a multinational corporatocracy (think
Amazon
dot com, Target Stores, Exxonmobile, Apple Inc., MicroSoft Inc.,
JPMorgan Chase & Company etcetera) built to finally take over
the
economic and political systems of a country’s national
government
in order that the people are to be openly ruled by these multinational
corporations and their corporate interests through cowardly sock
puppets posing as office holder members and heads of state.
It doesn’t take a clairvoyant to be able to see the trend of
things in the past hundred years of American history regarding the
centralization of political power and economic clout in an all powerful
federal government, a process that I’ve been monitoring for
many
decades since it was first brought to my attention in 1975. I began the
BeatTrafficTickets.org project in order to help myself as well as other
motivated people learn enough about the law to be able to fight back
and prevail against this imposed oppression one person at a time,
naively thinking that there might be a way to avoid having to bow to
the Powers That Be by arming oneself with knowledge of the law and
thereby escaping political persecution by public authority figures.
However, that delusion was quickly shattered by the fourteen month
“Ordeal” I underwent in 2018 and the first two an a
half
months of 2019 when I had to finally capitulate and cut my losses on
the third of three traffic tickets for driving without a license.
(Interested new subscribers can read about a portion of my ordeal in
the newsletter beginning with the newsletter titled “
Resurrection:
The Reason For My Silence” on page five of the
Newsletter Archive.) By
shattered
I mean that before that experience I would not have accepted that the
legal system in America was in total disrepair and virtually beyond
mending. That a court would or could ignore actual law over color of
law. But it happened. And it continues to happen every day in
courtrooms around America.
That experience didn’t cower me. It only made me more
determined
to seek lawful recourse to hold my persecutors accountable for their
criminal acts. I knew I was in the right and they were in the wrong, no
matter how much sophistry they used to justify their acts of piracy.
They dragged me (or rather my “person”) out into
the sea
(admiralty law, Law of the Sea) in order to do their dirty work. Now it
was my turn to find a way to drag them back onto dry land (the Law of
the Land) to make them accountable for the injustice they wrought.
There’s a saying in legal matters that “you only
lose when
you give up.” Or put another way “the one who
leaves the
field of battle first loses.” I may have lost a few battles,
but
I was always on the battlefield and not about to lose the war. And
that’s the kind of warrior mentality that we, now in
today’s world, have to have if we are not willing to settle
for a
safe life wearing the chains of servitude around our shoulders.
So, in that spirit there are a few things we can do in order to
peacefully (and lawfully) resist being forced (mandated) to do
something we would rather not do. But before I get into that, there are
a few things first that people need to know before they consider
rushing head long into consenting to the vaccine for the coronavirus.
It is at this point that those who do not wish to swallow the red pill
need to vacate this article. Just put it down and go do something else.
Everything is sweetness and light in your safe little world, and you do
not need to see the ugliness that the rest of us are confronting in the
real world. Because we’re going to find out how to get hold
of
hydroxychloroquine, which is quite safe and effective, despite what
your doctor might say to dissuade you or your pharmacist might try to
deny you. Peace of mind comes with true knowledge.
If you have been on the fence about the vaccines being touted as the
next best thing to sliced bread for your healthy protection from
Covid-19 should you have the misfortune of catching it, just sit back
comfortably in your favorite padded easy chair and prepare to have your
world rocked! If after seeing what follows you can still stomach taking
what in reality is an unproven
experimental
investigational agent vaccine
because your government and it’s lapdog Media says
it’s
“safe and effective,” then you should not have read
this
far, because you clearly have swallowed the blue pill.
I do this because I think, contrary to Jack Nicholson’s
character in
A Few Good
Men, that you
can
handle the truth! And that you deserve to know it before you make a
mistake that you could regret for the rest of what may almost certainly
be a shortened life. Last chance to abandon ship and go do something
else. Because from this point on, you are going find it
difficult
not to believe the treachery that your government (the corporatocracy)
has been planning for you!
Because some of you simply do not have the time to sit down and
research the validity of every legitimate fact that the
government is attempting to feed you, I have done the hard work of
discerning and culling the wheat from the chaff for you. The rest is up
to you to discern and confirm from your own observation the validity of
these views and to take advantage of what the alternative media has
learned and is blowing the whistle about.
This first information resource may, in the beginning, come off as
being wholly sensational and a bit off the wall, yet if you watch it
(or at least the first twenty or so minutes of it) it will set up the
next video which better explains the science behind what the Moderna
vaccine has been programmed to do. Like you, I dislike spending time
watching videos in order to find one or two or more nuggets of golden
information which I then have to validate in some way. I have therefore
endeavored to pull some relevant excerpts from these videos so that you
will have a reason (the incentive) to watch as much or as little of it
for yourself. First up is, as I mentioned above, the most sensational
of these videos.
This
Is the Video to Watch: Infecting W/COVID Swab, the RNA Vaccine,
Artificial Intelligence Saturday,
February 6, 2021 Time: 1:54:48
Within the first two minutes of this expose, mention is made of two
very shocking revelations about what Big Pharma has planned and already
has done for those who have consented to be tested and who plan on
taking the Moderna vaccine. The following brief excerpt is all
I’m going to provide you with to wet your whistle to see and
hear
more.
We have been lied to. The
Covid 19
vaccine is not a vaccine at all. It is a cellular Genetic Modification
technology [this is disclosed on the Moderna website], admittedly
designed to give those ignorant enough to take it a self-creating
auto-immune disease similar to what used to be called HIV. The covids
deep nasal test swabs are not tests at all. They too are a
multi-purpose nano-biological warfare and transhuman technology that we
will cover in great depth in this film.
This next information resource, provided by a doctor who knows how to
read scientific reports and who knows which of these medical articles
to look at to find the truth, will explain some of the real science
behind what the previous video calls the "self-creating auto-immune
disease" effect of the mRNA (or messengar RNA) Moderna vaccine. Dr.
Tenpenny has been blowing the whistle on Big Pharma for quite a few
years now, and is well qualified to share her contrarian view about the
sinister content of some of Big Pharma’s most touted
medicines.
If you have the time do watch the whole video because you will be amply
rewarded with fascinating additional information and knowledge you
won’t have gotten anywhere else. If you don’t have
the time
to watch the whole video, for your own sake if not those you love,
watch at least the first twenty to thirty minutes.
Dr.
Sherri Tenpenny Explains How the Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start
Working In 3-6 Months! - Must Video Thursday,
February 11, 2021
Time: 1:03:06 Reinette Senum interview of Sherri Tenpenny
A brief excerpt from the beginning five or more minutes:
Why you must refuse
because these
vaccines are deadly. ... It’s going to take between four
months
to fourteen months before we start seeing the full ravage of
what’s going to happen to people who are vaccinated with this
vaccine.
At the 20:30 mark, Sherri explains: “It’s the
re-exposure
[to coronavirus] that leads to the antibody dependent enhancement and
all this accelerated autoimmune disease.”
And later on, at the 22:30 minute mark, for those who would like to
read more about the science that Big Pharma doesn’t want you
thinking about.
Sherri’s website
is Vaxxter.com.
Click at the top where it says Dr. Tenpenny’s Blog.
She’s
written a six part series on the coronavirus.
But then the pharmaceutical companies have been given what amounts to a
“get out of jail free card” by, you guessed it, the
United
States Congress, the organization that claims to be your government.
The pharma companies cannot be held liable for damages on any of these
admittedly
experimental
drugs. If a relative happens to die from one of the vaccines, you have
no civil recourse to come after the perpetrator and responsible party
of this misinformation campaign.
For another qualified perspective in the following video, please do
listen all the way through to what Dr. Gold has to say in explaining
several relevant and disturbing points about the vaccines. This woman
is on a mission to educate as many people as possible! Do not take what
she has to say lightly. She, in addition to her medical license, has a
juris doctorate. She has researched the law on this!
Dr. Simone Gold
– The Truth About Covid-19 and The Covid-19 Vaccine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rxdxf-zHfU8
Time: 51:02
In the video Dr. Gold mentions how to obtain the HCQ drug. Go to
AmericasFrontlineDoctors.com if you would like to stock your medicine
cabinet with hydroxychloroquine and obtain peace of mind. Their website
organization has partnered with a telemedicine company to be able to,
on the spot, get you a prescription for this drug for personal use. A
small tip I learned from one of my other subscribers: if the pharmacist
ever refuses to fill a prescription on the basis that it is being used
to treat the cornonavirus, just have the doctor make out the
prescription for the treatment of arthritis, and the pharmacist will
have no recourse to refuse you. (Notice that, for a long time, they
made it illegal for pharmacists to fill a prescription for HCQ if it
was prescribed as treatment for the cornavirus! Just more evidence that
the corporations and their enforcement arm, the government, do not have
your best interests in mind.)
In this next interview of Dr. Gold, Michelle Malkin learns how to
legally refuse to take the vaccine if someone attempts to mandate it
for your consumption.
Frontline Doctor Simone
Gold: FBI
‘Broke Down My Door’ In Swat Team Raid Of 20 Men.
Must See
Simone Gold Interview With Michelle Malkin On Stop Medical
Discrimination! Wednesday, February
24, 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3X6SKexq75FH/
Time: 50:43
The whole interview is fascinating and well worth watching. But if you
are in a rush for time, you can skip down to the 15:15 mark to catch
the following from Dr. Gold.
It is written clearly that
this is an experimental
agent. It is written in the law. The FDA application. They [the
vaccines] are currently called investigational status only. And
investigational is defined as experimental. So legally they are in experimental
status. That has legal implications downstream in terms of ability to
sue and compensation and all of that. In addition, it’s very
clear by long history of Nueremberg Code, Helsinki Declaration and by
Federal Code of Regulations, that you can never pressure or coerce or
duress, those are the words in the statute, anybody to take an experimental
agent. We’ve known this since the Nazi era. I can’t
believe, truly, that were having any kind of conversation about any
kind of mandate forexperimental anything. Because it’s
clearly
against the law. It’s against humanity. And this is well
established all across the world for decades. ... This is an experimental
investigational agent!
Then again at the 33:20 mark Dr. Gold reemphasizes the importance of
stressing the experimental aspect of the vaccines should someone
attempt to mandate that you take it.
I’ve had so many
people who
don’t even know it’s in investigational status. So
how is
that informed consent? They don’t write it anywhere. I had to
search it. I had to find the paperwork to show that it’s an
investigational status. So that’s the beginning and end of
discussion. This is not informed consent. You don’t even know
it’s investigational. And
very important, investigational meds can NEVER be coerced! By federal
law.
What strikes me about her seeming incredulity (and frankly, what might
be her naïveté about this issue) at presuming that
any
public official or corporate private concern (like an airline) will
immediately back down if someone mentions the legal liability of being
forced to take something that has an experimental status and is
patently against to law to do, is that even so, my life’s
experience tells me that government (and the corporations, for that
matter) is not above using coercion anyway. They do it every day in the
courts. So until this advice is tested and proves to be true, its use
in the real world may remain somewhat ambiguous and therefore
inconsistent. Still in all, it is good to know and to be able to use if
necessary in order stand your ground against an obvious injustice when
someone is attempting to mandate that you risk your life on an unproven
treatment.
Also in this interview Dr. Gold speaks about being able to obtain
hydroxychloroquine (at the 26:20 mark) for those who might like to
stock the drug at home.
Also the number one
questions we were
asked is: How do I get my hands on hydroxychloroquine? Because it can
save my life. So right thinking people know this. So we [at
AmericasFrontlineDoctors.com] made that possible. We partnered with a
telemedicine company. And you can go to our site and you can consult
with them, the third party service, and you can obtain
hydroxychloroquine. ... It can be very difficult to get from your own
doctor.
If you need an additional opinion from another impartial source about
the efficacy of HCQ and where you are able to obtain it, you can read
about a second doctor’s association, The Association of
American
Physicians and Surgeons, that also will help people obtain HCQ. I found
this story on the World Net Daily website, listing an additional source
for medicinal remedy:
https://www.wnd.com/2021/02/despite-news-blackout-awesome-covid-19-protection-available/
Dr. Jane Orient of the
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has made the great
point that FDA has no
legal authority to regulate the practice of medicine.
Nevertheless, by its actions on HCQ, for example, it ends up doing
exactly that.
Besides the information provided previously here, there are some very
useful websites. Two of the best ones are the websites of America’s Frontline
Doctors and the Association
of American Physicians and Surgeons. Both have details on
protocols that have achieved respect by medical professionals.
Another very useful site is c19protocols.com. There are two main
sections: one for early
treatment and one for prevention. Each provides links to
specific websites providing detailed information.
Yet another useful site that is updated frequently is covexit.com. It provides many videos covering
both treatment and news. Of special value are videos
featuring some successful frontline doctors using early home/outpatient COVID
treatment. You must learn to use the feature at the bottom
of the home page to progress to other pages.
If someone asks you about what medical authority (that is, beyond the
fact that it is stated in federal law) you are using to assert your
right not to be forced to take something against your will, you can use
the following as a legal explanation. Starting at the 36:10 mark Dr.
Gold talks about wanting to teach people how to recognize propaganda
and what proof one needs in order to be able to accept the information
as valid. It strikes me that this may also be used to make assertions
protecting one’s legal rights. That is, based on the
recommendation of a trusted information source, a “trusted
person,” you have come to the conclusion that you should not
take
the vaccine.
Because I want to teach
people how to recognize propaganda in real time. [I Do Not Consent
book] There’s ultimately only two sources of reliable
information. There’s the actual science itself
where you have to actually go down and be a scientist, read it, learn
it, know it. Or in any subject. Or you really know a trusted person
who tells you something. That’s it. Those are the only two
reliable sources of information. And then there is: What did the data
and the scientific journals say prior to the controversy. Prior to
twenty twenty. What was the evidence prior to the controversy.
If you think you may not be faced with having to stand up for your
rights up against the corporations who will make proof of having passed
a coronavirus test or having been vaccinated a mandate to do business
with them, think again and read the story in the link below. The
private corporations can do this because it becomes a contractual
obligation if you wish to interact with them. Something similar to the
adhesion contract that governments use —
“adhesion”
here referring to a take it or leave it basis, as with the driver
license issue.
“
A
New World Altogether” - Global Airlines Set To “Go
Live In March”
With COVID ‘Passports’
Imagine a world where the
ability to
travel on a commercial airliner depends on passing a COVID-19 test or
taking a vaccine. If a traveler tests positive or did not receive or
refused to take the vaccine, they would be locked out of air travel.
In the next installation of this two part series we will take up
another video of what might be misinformation as part of a PsyOps
operation. Or it may be authentic information about what has occurred
in the American past and is currently happening behind the scenes. We
will just have to wait and see which it is.
Yet aside from that uncertainty, for those readers who are not aware of
the history of events leading up to the present day, the presenter in
this the video provides about as concise a detailed history showing how
government justifies its actions vis-à-vis the change in
applicable law, of which I am aware and which aligns with my own
research, of how the United States arrived at the precipice of where we
are at today in terms of either being able to maintain the republic or
of losing it.
Yours sincerely,
Thomas Eliot
Common Law Remedy
BeatTrafficTickets.Org
_________________
For Your Consideration: The New Face of War!
Part Two
Date: 31, 2021
Hello Friends,
Once again, today, I am deviating from writing directly about the
traffic ticket issue, although not from writing about the deeper issues
included within that issue which touch upon an important understanding
of the greater historical evidence responsible for the present growing
oppressive legal climate in our country. Admittedly will I need to
provide a more cogent discussion evidencing certain cloaked facts
regarding the foundations of our country which help to validate an
unrevealed view of that history to all but those who dug deeper into
the historical evidence.
One of the main facts I’m hinting
at, which will help to bring into focus the subsequent onerous changes
to what is generally accepted
as “law” in our country, is the fact that the
Constitution
for the united States (the original 1787 Constitution and ultimately
the 1789 Constitution with the Bill of Rights attached, that is) is
effectively a bankruptcy instrument addressing debt owed to certain
sovereign entities who loaned the Continental Congress the financial
wherewithal to sustain a revolution against the British King. This
discussion, however, will need to wait for another day as the present
morale of our country is so fragile that if we don’t realize
certain realities and take the appropriate actions, some of us may not
be here to help pick up the pieces of our splintered republic.
In case you haven’t been paying attention to current events
— or the political rhetoric of our One Party political system
which now has shown its true colors for all to see by forcing on an
amazed and incredulous public the obviously false results of a
questionable election — the equivalent of the 1941 attack on
Pearl Harbor for the contemporary generation has occurred and is
ongoing. What am I referring to? The equally questionable and
fallacious
advent of the hyped up coronavirus so-called pandemic and its spread
not only across America but the whole world, which has given local
governments a dishonest excuse to shut down economic activity in every
city and town across America in an effort to economically starve as
many people as possible of their livelihoods. It is equally obvious
that this unfortunate happenstance is not by mistake but rather by
design.
People who have no clue or who are distracted by the strain of their
own lives from paying closer attention to current events happening in
our society turn indiscriminately to a superficial media for their news
and end up being propagandized with half truths and blatant falsehoods.
Anyone who has endured the past four years observing the obvious bias
in the media and who hasn’t seen through it deserves to be
deceived. In the midst of this artificially created chaos that we have
all witnessed, sadly once again, is the unmistakable frankness of the
observation that “In war, truth is always the first
casualty.” In case you, dear reader, missed the implication
here,
yes, we (that is, all mankind on every continent and country on the
earth) are engaged in a war that would strip our very humanity from us
if we let it.
This is not a conventional war that we are all used to seeing, but
rather a war for hearts and minds aimed squarely at the frailties of
the human condition in order to bring about forced change in human
behavior. The weapons used in this war play on our emotions and mental
reasoning. The fomenting of fear, anxiety, and social division are at
the forefront of the spearhead of attack. Yet the truth is out there.
It’s just being covered over, changed and rearranged. But
where
do we look for it? How do we find it? How can we be sure
we’re
not being played again by a secondary information source claiming to be
authentic and truthful?
Well, we can pretty much eliminate anything we see or read in the media
because we’ve already got their number. Equally whatever the
media is telling us to do, we must be assured by their disingenuousness
that doing the opposite is likely better for us. First they say
it’s okay not to wear a mask. Then they switch and tell us
that
masks are mandatory, and they recruit a willing corporate America to
enforce the mandate. It’s the retail stores and restaurants
telling you what to do, supporting the government. Yet when we look a
little closer it is quite apparent that major corporate institutions
(Jeff Bezos’ Amazon, Bill Gate’s Microsoft et al.
etc.) in
American are behind this pandemic, as well as institutions like the
World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Yet digging a little deeper, we come across a growing number of very
reputable voices in the scientific community, not only in America but
all over the world, who dissent from the accepted view or narrative
(propaganda!) of the day. And they have the evidence to back up and
support their contrary opinions. In other words, the truth is there,
and after some research to verify what we’re looking at, we
just
need to accept that truth.
Because it confirms the fact that the federal government is being used
as a straw frontman heading the suppression of the economy with its
mandated lock down pronouncements from on high which liberal governors
haughtily oblige in their faux self-important arrogance using their
concern for public health as an excuse for their unconstitutional
actions against the rights of people. Governors like
California’s
Gavin Newsom, Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer, and New
York’s
Andrew Cuomo all of whom have endeavored to drive their
state’s
economies into the ground! Without mincing words for those who resist
and dismiss the idea of conspiracies, if this development in current
events is not enough for you to see that the government is at war with
its own citizens, then you must have your head in the sand and are not
paying attention to the obvious.
Unless you are researching every fact that the mainstream media (MSM)
are putting out and not accepting it at face value, you are not even in
the game (i.e., the war that is ongoing)! Make no mistake, just as was
revealed in your welcoming email to the newsletter,
“Introduction: An Inconvenient Truth,” the
occupying agents
for a foreign principal in the United States government “is
at
war with you, its own citizens. That is it’s official policy.
. .
.You . . . are an enemy of the (corporate) state.” You may
have
thought that was hyperbole when you first read it. But now, today, the
fact that the actors and agents who are office holders in government
are at war with its own people falsely deemed to be
“citizens” within its jurisdiction is being openly
pushed
into our faces.
I know that not everyone, for one reason or another, has the time to
pay close daily attention to what is happening in current events. I
even struggle to keep up with it, and I research it every day! So, when
I come across some important and timely information that I have
personally vetted for my own peace of mind, I will share it with the
readers of this newsletter in order to provide a heads up warning or to
add to your understanding of how we got to the place we are today.
Fixing the legal system in this country — if indeed we are
even
able to fix it — is not going to happen if we don’t
first
deal with the hostile occupation of our country by a foreign entity.
But before we can do that, we have to know and understand just who that
entity (enemy) is! I have literally been researching this since 1975
when I was first made aware of this fact by a book written by Gary
Allen titled
None Dare
Call It Conspiracy.
The book itself, I later learned, had gotten some of its facts wrong.
But the main thrust of the information was readily provable through
personal observation and a little extra digging into the history.
The full story, though, of the true history of the united States of
America and how it was originally set up has been somewhat concealed
and difficult to track and verify for me over the years. However I
recently came across a video that has helped to put into place what may
be many of the missing pieces of the puzzle (that is, if the facts
disclosed in it can be trusted to be true). It is not a perfect
retelling of the story from what I can tell. Some of the opinions of
the presenter are not always accurate in their evaluation of the facts.
But the main bulk of the information, the essential scaffolding,
upholding the original intentions for colonizing the North American
land mass and the realities of what occurred have been preserved and do
stand the smell test.
Importantly,
the presentation offers a
kind of overview digest of the
high point events that took place and correctly addresses the most
important aspect of that early and ongoing history (ongoing because it
yet affects us today), which was the original bankruptcy of the United
States to its foreign creditors after the Revolutionary War. While it
might be difficult for many to accept, the founding on the North
American continent of thirteen separate countries described as a
federation of states in the Articles of Confederation, was based upon a
falsehood expressed to the people of that time. The truth was that the
colony’s chief oppressor, King George III of England, was
backing
(financing) both sides of the war of revolution, which
basically
meant that he couldn’t lose the war.
This fact can be easily confirmed in public
writings regarding the
Paris
Peace Treaty of September 30, 1783
wherein the terms of the treaty are laid out. It is a document whose
main thrust — after all the window dressing about territorial
boundaries and access thereto by members of both countries as well as
the declaration by His Majesty that “the said United States .
. .
to be free sovereign and independent states, that he treats with them
as such, and for himself, his heirs, and successors,
relinquishes all claims to the
government, propriety, and territorial rights of the
same” — is for the repayment of financial debts
owed to those in a creditor position.
In that Treaty document King George III is revealingly referred to as
“Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great
Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick
and Lunebourg,
arch-treasurer
and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire
etc., and of the United States of America,...” And there it
is,
stated for all time immemorial, that the British King is a subservient
agent for the Holy Roman Empire! For those of you who still find it
difficult to accept this reality, how would you explain the fact that
the Magna Carta of June 15th, 1215 forced upon King John who
subsequently refused to accept and abide by it, which Charter was later
invalidated by Pope Innocent III after it was recognized that neither
side stood beside their commitments — neither King John nor
the
English land Barons who opposed the King’s policies, as
dictated
by the Vatican, on feudal payments, among other things, to the Crown?
History tells us that the British monarchy was subordinate to the
dictates of the Pope of Rome.
When you get to Article 4 of the Paris Peace Treaty, we find the
following being stated: “It is agreed that
creditors on either
side
shall meet with no
lawful impediment to
the recovery of the full value in sterling money
of all bona fide debts
heretofore contracted.” And then again in
Article 5 the following was stated: “It is agreed
that Congress shall earnestly
recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states
to
provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties,
which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects;
and also of the estates, rights,
and
properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his
Majesty’s arms
and who have not borne arms against the said United States.”
Does
this sound like the Americans won any war? The terms of the Treaty
indicate that the British King still controlled all the relevant
issues. Does that indicate the disposition of a beaten enemy? Most
assuredly not!
And for anyone still doubting the control that His Majesty of Great
Britain had over the terms of the “surrender,” the
last
paragraph in Article 5 nails the lid on the coffin based on the fact
that if anyone won the war of revolution that
that someone was
England. “And it is agreed
that all persons
[including British subjects]
who
have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts,
marriage settlements, or otherwise,
shall
meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights.”
Otherwise, why would a victor agree to such terms? Victors usually own
the terms over the vanquished, right? This just points out the fact
that the common American colonists were being hoodwinked from the
start! Yet
what is worse, they bought into it! Probably because not too many of
them were literate and therefore did not understand the meaning and
import of the terms if they were even aware of them to begin with.
The debt payment being due in 1788, by 1787 it became apparent to the
members in Congress Assembled that the United States was not going to
make good on repayment to the King of monies lent during the so-called
revolution according to the terms of the Paris Treaty that was signed,
and that the Articles of Confederation (AoC) were not going to be
useful in solving the problem of the repayment of the debt because
there was no way to
force
the
states to contribute to settling the debt that others (i.e., within the
government, presumably for the benefit of all) had incurred. Yet, as
far as international law was concerned, the die had already been cast:
the U.S. Congress through its representatives had agreed to the terms
of the Paris Peace Treaty.
So, in keeping with the pre-planned spector of default, delegates from
five states met at the Annapolis Convention (formally titled as a
Meeting of Commissioners to Remedy Defects of the Federal Government)
and invited all states to a larger convention to be held in
Philadelphia in 1787. The Confederation Congress later endorsed this
convention “for the sole and express purpose of revising the
Articles of Confederation.” That was a blatant falsehood
which
the people bought. It was already well known among those who were
literate that the AoC was an imperfect document to achieve the stated
goal of debt repayment. The Convention took place from May 25 to
September 17,1787 in the old Pennsylvania State House (which today is
known as Independence Hall) in Philadelphia.
During the Confederation Period, the United States was essentially a
federation of independent republics, with the Articles guaranteeing
state sovereignty and independence. The Confederation was governed by
the Congress of the Confederation, a unicameral legislature whose
members were chosen by the state legislatures and in which each state
cast a single vote. Congress was given a limited set of powers, mainly
in the area of waging war and foreign affairs. It could not levy taxes
or tariffs, and it could only request money from the states, with no
power to force delinquent states to pay. Since the Articles could only
be amended by a unanimous vote of the states, any state had effective
veto power over any proposed change. A super majority (nine of thirteen
state delegations) was required for Congress to pass major legislation
such as declaring war, making treaties, or borrowing money. The
Confederation had no executive or judicial branches, which meant the
Confederation government lacked effective means to enforce its own laws
and treaties against state non-compliance. It soon became evident to
nearly all that the Confederation government, as originally organized,
was inadequate for managing the various problems confronting the United
States
Once the details of the make up and powers of the federal government
were set in place by the convention and laid down in writing in the
drafting of a constitution, the business of having that constitution
make good on the promises of debt repayment made by the Continental
Congress at the end
of the rebellion against the English King were taken up. The
constitution thereby became by default, in spirit if not in name, a
bankruptcy instrument in international law. The new fledgling United
States government would never be truly free and independent of Great
Britain until the terms of the Treaty of Peace were adhered to and met.
This brings us to the present presentation provided by a former Army
Special Ops member Robert Leroy Horton. Whether or not this
presentation is part of a larger Psy-Ops operation remains to be seen.
My purpose in bringing it to reader’s attention is for a
quick
and concise overview of some of the history leading up to our present
circumstance in today’s world events much of which aligns
with my
own personal research. Understanding how we got to this circumstance in
the first place is the first step to being able to deal with it.
The presentation is made in two parts. The first part deals with a
retelling of the history leading up to today, while the second part is
self-described as a “deep dive into the facts surrounding
Part
One,” in an attempt to explain the significance of two
characters
(David Wynn Miller and Russell Jay Gould) introduced in Part One who
are said to have redeemed the country back to the people of America.
Whether any of their story has any validity, I could not say. The fact
that this is addressed “to us anons”
doesn’t sit well
with me as that whole Anon movement is, from what I can gather, part of
a Psy-Ops operation designed to confuse and control the people who buy
into it.
Must Watch! Special Ops Revealed! They Will Hide This From You At All
Cost! A Military Insider Interview [Part One] Tuesday,
February
9, 2021 21:28
https://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2021/02/must-watch-special-ops-revealed-they-will-hide-this-from-you-at-all-cost-a-military-insider-interview-2-3225687.html
Time: 1:05.28 War Castles Military
Insider Robert Leroy Horton
[Pt 2] SPECIAL OPS REVEALED! Dirtiest Secrets Of The [DS] EXPOSED! A
Military Insider Interview!
https://rumble.com/vasrkz-pt-2-special-ops-revealed-dirtiest-secrets-of-the-ds-exposed-a-military-ins.html
James Red Pills America Published October 21, 2020
Time:
1:18:32 [Fast forward to the 2:00 minute mark for the
beginning
of the presentation]
By no means do I endorse that people believe any of the assertions made
by Robert Horton regarding the narrative he outlines that the military
is being used to put down the movement into a new world order (NWO).
From
what I can tell, these two videos are over four years old. A lot of
water
has passed under the bridge since then and what do we have to show for
it? This is as much a spiritual battle as it is a physical and
psychological battle to
overcome those who would control and oppress us.
Each person needs to take responsibility for his or her own actions and
step up, with the correct education, to be able to succeed in resisting
the psychological pressure to go along with the NWO indoctrination.
That indoctrination can only succeed if people go along with it. The
establishment likes to make people think there are only ever two
choices during any crisis, and both choices involve giving up more
freedom or giving government more power. What they don’t want
you
to consider is the third option – The people taking power for
themselves and removing power from those that would abuse it. What they
don’t want is for the people, those who are like-minded about
personal liberty, to form their own organizational resistance not
beholden to any single political figure or top down power structure.
When going up against the Establishment’s legal system, there
is
safety in numbers. And if you can join with an already organized group
where you have the opportunity to learn as you progress, so much the
better. One such group that I came across recently calls itself the
National Action Task Force (
https://national-taskforce.org).
This is an offshoot of another group founded by a man named Mark Emery
who founded the Lighthouse Law Club. I am familiar with Mr. Emery and
his Lighthouse Law Club. I came across him a couple of years ago, and
he is the real deal. Mark also heads up the National Action Task Force
(N.A.T.F.), which is a private national membership organization that
assists
people in, among other things, standing up against criminal legal
process.
I haven’t had a chance to fully look into this organization
yet
myself, but it appears to be well documented and well thought out. Mark
knows the law and has first hand experience in fighting back and
winning against government tyrannical treatment. Watch the following
video for an informative interview of Mark Emery and one of the
N.A.T.F. student members Paul Peterson. We may be able to benefit from
their efforts and research.
https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/03/taking-our-country-back-holding-the-criminals-accountable/
TAKING OUR COUNTRY BACK & HOLDING THE CRIMINALS
ACCOUNTABLE!!
March 21, 2021 Time: 1:04:44 Mark Emery of
Lighthouse Law
Club.
When you check out their organization (
national-taskforce.org)
go to the Resource tab and find the following important links to help
provide you with actionable ideas.
https://national-taskforce.org/fighting-medical-tyranny
https://national-taskforce.org/important-news
https://national-taskforce.org/educational-videos
In that last link to educational videos there are eight important
videos worth viewing. Watch
THE
STATE vs. a Patriot Princess
to see an ongoing case in Minnesota about a business owner who has,
with the assistance of N.A.T.F., filed a counterclaim against her
oppressors, the governor of Minnesota among others, who wanted to shut
her business down and who made unlawful threats to do so.
Another interesting video to watch on the educational videos page is:
Resistance Boot Campvideo:
Who’s in Control Here? Here’s how you
might
handle yourself when someone wants to assume authority over you. Mark
presents a series of statements and questions to ask your oppressor
which puts that opponent on the defensive.
And for an overview of the organization itself on that same page and
how people can participate, watch the following:
National Action Task Force
webinar: The vision & the road ahead.
The first 2 minutes shows public officials who have been held to
account for their criminal actions.
Leading elite and Bilderberger founder the late David Rockefeller, when
asked if
he was concerned that the American patriots movement in the United
States might upend the one world order that he and his ilk have been
working toward for most of their professional life, replied,
“No,
I’m not concerned. Number one, they are not organized. And
number
two, they are not well funded. So no, I’m not
concerned.”
And therein he pointed out the weaknesses of the freedom movement. This
was something that alarmed me from the very beginning because I could
see that there was disunity among the people and no organizational
skill being applied against a well-organized and well funded opposition
to that liberty. And while this does not bode well for the future of
liberty minded people should it remain the same, it only underscores
the need for us to come together, in whatever way we can, to begin an
organized resistance and challenge to the Powers That Be who would
usurp our God given freedoms.
As small as it may seem, even being able to fight the imposition of an
unlawful victimless traffic ticket can begin to make its mark in the
battle to maintain our freedom. The more people who know how to do
this, the stronger the message we are sending to those who oppose us.
And the more we educate those in the legal system to see that the
organization they belong to is willing to limit their own rights and
freedoms too in the same unethical and immoral way that is being
imposed on
the public at large. If we really want this, each of us need to be
willing to
step up and take it as
a personal challenge and educate ourselves against the encroaching
tyranny being planned to roll out. If not now, then when will we stand
up and oppose this treatment? And if not us, then who is going to make
this happen?
It is time more people got some skin in the game.
On a more positive note, in the next newsletter I plan on sharing
information about a process wherein we can take back control of the
NAME and end the court's ability to obtain jurisdiction. I’ve
been researching this approach for quite some time now, but because of
personal health issues and other interruptions, have not been able to
corroborate anything specific and positive about its use. And at
present, I am not in a position to do so. So, I'm just going to lay it
out there for others to consider and possibly prove for themselves. If
this approach proves useful, it could be a game changer!
As always I encourage your feedback, if you have a question or a
comment, pro or con. They are welcome as this helps me to assess the
practical merits of the information provided. Just be patient with me
as with all that is on my plate right now, it may take some time for me
to reply.
Yours sincerely,
Thomas Eliot
Common Law Remedy
BeatTrafficTickets.Org
_________________
Two New (And Important) Articles
That Each Subscriber Needs To Read!
Date: June 7, 2021
Hello Friends,
In my quest to get to the bottom of the reality underlying why the
courts are acting as they are, I have recently discovered what I think
is one of the main secrets courts use in order to gain jurisdiction
without the victim understanding how or why this happened. In order to
explain this phenomenon, I have broken up the information into two new
articles.
First, I need to explain why it has taken me so long to complete these
two articles. It’s not because the compositions are
complicated to write and need the extra time, although that
certainly could be true. Nor it is true, at least to a greater rather
than a lesser degree, that I needed extra time to research certain
aspects of the material, although that certainly is likely true, it
wasn't a factor in the present case. Under any brighter circumstances,
I would have finished these articles much sooner than I did.
What has held me back is a debilitating chronic illness that saps me of
energy and acts as a distraction when I have planned to get certain
things done. Since I have no trust in the mainstream allopathic medical
system to assist me with this illness (I have fired for incompetence
three different so-called “medical providers”
during this time), I have been going at this alone. This has been a
particularly challenging illness to figure out and properly treat,
which has cut into the limited time I have each day to get anything
done. I’ve tried several treatment protocols on this illness
over the past eleven months with mixed results, but never with the
impression given that I have turned the corner on the disease.
It has taken time to research, find, and evaluate each treatment as
this illness has progressed which in turn has bitten into the time I
have to work on other things. The good news is that the newest
treatment I have begun may be showing signs of a positive outcome in
terms of turning the corner, but I’ll have to wait and see
over the next period of time. I want to thank those people who have
written to me suggesting various healing modalities for me to look
into. Hopefully the protocol that I’m currently on will prove
effective enough in the not too distant future for me to conclude that
I am turning the corner and beginning to get a handle on healing.
We’ll see. Anyway, on to the two new articles.
The first article, “
The
American Legal System Is Not What You Think It Is; What I Have Learned
So Far” is based upon my experience in court
combined with research I have been doing for the past several years.
When the education system teaches one thing and your experience with
that teaching in the real world contradicts it, then you know something
unknown is afoot affecting things. This article endeavors to point out
certain historical consistencies that have contributed to the way
today’s courts treat cases. Hopefully this explanation will
resonate in more people’s minds than not in order to explain
the inconsistencies we see in the current legal system, and to shed
some light on how we might handle them.
The second article picks up where the first article leaves off, and is
entitled “
The
Twelve Presumption Of Court Which Must Be Overcome.”
When looking at and evaluating any new or previously undisclosed legal
process, I always seek to corroborate it with some testimony from the
real world. This isn’t always possible, and because of that a
perfectly effective process can be thrown into some doubt because no
actual evidence can be ascertained to verify its use in reality. In
this case, I was able to find a seminar put on by David Straight which
lent testimony to the importance of the necessity to rebut the
presumptions that courts use (cunningly and in my opinion illegally) to
rope people into their jurisdiction. However I was not pleased with
relatively brief and incomplete treatment these concepts were given in
his talk as he was easily drawn off point by questions from his
audience.
We must really take a close look at the public officials who have
agreed to become a party to this trickery in order to determine who
they really are. Anyone who agrees that it is okay, using artifice and
deception, to confine their fellow man into a life of perpetual slavery
simply because they know a secret that the rest of us do not must have
something major wrong in their mental programming, to say the least! No
doubt there is an amount of ego, conceit, vanity and arrogance in these
people that plays an important role, if not the fact that many are
being blackmailed to avoid disgrace by powers greater than they.
On the other hand, perhaps this demonstrates the alarming degree to
which evil in this world is able to influence otherwise decent people
who are too frail or weak to stand up to such bullying from the
established status quo. At any rate, it does seem to say something
about the entire institution of the legal profession that it should
succumb to the lower depths of hell based upon human weakness and
self-interest. Perhaps this lends credence, if not evidence, to the
truism that “every man has his price.” I guess it
just depends upon the man and the particular circumstances. At any
rate, there is no excuse for such behavior in society. Not now, not
ever. And I don't think that one of the founders of our country, Thomas
Jefferson, would disagree with that.
So, for better or worse, there you have it.
As always I encourage any feedback, if you have a question or a
comment, pro or con. They are welcome as this helps me to assess the
practical merits of the information provided.
Yours sincerely,
Thomas Eliot
Common Law Remedy
BeatTrafficTickets.Org
_________________
New Article: Register the Legal
NAME and Take Control of It
Date: July 20, 2021
Hello Friends,
This has been a long time in coming. I have been meaning to get this
article up on the website for the longest of time, yet because of its
sensitive nature, have had to wait through interruptions and to gather
more real world evidence that it does what it’s proponents
say it will do. I do my best not to be part of the unintended
misinformation onslaught that has captured the Internet Information
Highway.
A bit of background information is appropriate at this point. I first
came upon this concept and process in the Fall of 2018 as I was
battling the third and final traffic ticket in the experience that I
call “The Ordeal.” At first glance, it seemed to be
a valid way to challenge the plaintiff’s ability to attach
personam jurisdiction in the matter. I came across an audio file on
Youtube in which the man being interviewed explained his discovery of a
method which allowed him to defend, as a man, the NAME captioned on a
court document. To say the least I was intrigued.
In the course of doing due diligence research, I was able to locate two
other videos on this same subject, one of them an interview given by a
couple who were students of and had implemented and used the concept
explained by the man in the first audio file, and who were having
success employing it. After transcribing a couple of videos, I
hurriedly began gathering the necessary forms and other information
explaining how to set this process up. I read through the material and
began executing the actions necessary to bring the process into
existence.
By this time in my Ordeal, I was seeking anything that might let me
differentiate my capacity as a man from the legal fiction on court
documentation. I was in the process of using this experience (that of
fighting three traffic tickets back-to-back) to test one so-called
remedy to my situation after the other to see which might stick. So
far, the only one that showed any promise of achieving a positive
outcome was this process that the man in the audio pesentation had
described. It of course is always dicey using Internet sources of
information. You never know when you’ve come across mis- or
disinformation. And I have come across my fair share of that!
So it came to be that on the flimsiest thread of verification for the
process (one Internet couple who had successfully used the process),
and pretty much out of desperation, I decided to give it a go. Had I
known about this method beforehand I most assuredly would have
implemented it a lot earlier. But as it was, perhaps I could still
learn something about it anyway in the present circumstance.
The premise for the process seemed reasonable and simple enough.
Throughout this time I had been reading material I was coming across
about how the Vatican supposedly has a copyright on our all capitalized
NAME, and the courts were just exercising a breach of copyright law
when they convicted a victim. Whether that was true or not, I
didn’t know (at present I tend to think not), but I was
willing to play along to find out. The so-called remedy for this
circumstance was to gain permission, through registration of what
amounts to a tradename, to use the name in commerce without it
attaching legally to the man or woman doing so. This involved
obtaining what is called an Assumed Name Certificate (ANC) along with
the accompanying Certificate of Existence and Registration which allows
the holder permission to use the NAME without any legal repercussions.
There was only one hitch: you had to jump through a few narrow hoops
before the legal system would recognized the method, and you had to
have been supplied with a valid plan of implementation beforehand for
it to be effective.
Luckily for me, my sources of information were straight and true. My
luck ran out when I learned that I had not done this in a timely manner
with regard to the legal matter with which I was dealing at
the
time. But in learning that fact, I was provided with a valuable
validation for the process itself from none other than the prosecutor
himself. Still, though, you never know whether or not they
(prosecutors) are lying. So I ended up waiting, giving it some time to
see how things would go, before reporting on this process.
It’s been five years now since that couple implemented and
started using the ANC in their lives, and I’m happy to report
that they have not suffered any legal repercussions from having done
so.
As with any method that deals with limiting the state’s
ability to gather revenue, there are some roadblocks to avoid. What the
states statutory information doesn’t tell you about this
process is that there is only one state in the Union where the language
used will allow one to take advantage of limiting the effect on the
state’s ability to prosecute a matter. You have to know which
state that is, and how to properly fill out their application form in
order to get their system provide you with the correct language on the
finished product, the Assumed Name Certificate. But once you have that
finished product, you in essence have a get-out-of-jail-free card that
can be used for ten years, and then renewed thereafter if need be.
For some people who do their due diligent research and learn everything
there is to learn about this process, this could amount to a game
changer. It will require making some mental changes about your everyday
living situation in order to maintain, but that's a small price to pay
for immunity from the legal system. I don’t want to give away
too much here because I want people to read the article where all the
advantages and roadblocks are all laid out with links to information
resources so that people can get up and running with this information
as soon as possible.
Here's the link to the article. Enjoy.
Take
Control Of The Name With An
Assumed Name Certificate
As a preview of coming attractions, my next article will be outlining
what amounts to a real Game Changer that will show a person how to opt
out of the legal system altogether in such a way that the government
authorities cannot challenge it in any way while having to walk on
eggshells whenever they are around you. In addition, it will educate
people about the concepts of law and history that were used to get us
to this point. And for that alone, it is a valuable resource of which
to take advantage. Now, that's something serious to think
about!
As always I encourage any feedback, if you have a question or a comment
on the article, pro or con. They are welcome as this helps me to assess
the practical merits of the information provided.
Yours sincerely
Thomas Eliot
Common Law Remedy
BeatTrafficTickets.Org
_________________
If you would like to learn more about these concepts so you can avoid
the whole mess without having to “appear” in court
at all,
you can download our free ebook
Common
Law Remedy To Beat Traffic Tickets and learn about the
secrets that the courts and legal profession don’t want you
to know.
If you’d like to learn more about the law and how it can
serve you, don’t hesitate to check out our
Articles
on Traffic Law
section. Discover some of the secrets of law that you’ve
never been taught!
The
laws sometimes sleep,
but never die.